Anne Strachan (ca. 1799–1871)

Anne Strachan (ca. 1799–1871)

In Praeterita, Ruskin characterizes the household servant Anne (or Ann or Anna) as “my fatherʼs nurse, and mine”, paying tribute to her “natural gift and specialty . . . the service of a sick room”. A life‐long servant, she was thus “occupied” with “other peopleʼs good instead of her own”, Ruskin writes, from “the age of fifteen to seventy‐two” (Ruskin, Works, 35:30–31. a paragraph first published in letter 28 of Fors Clavigera in 1873, two years after Anneʼs death [Ruskin, Works, 27:517–18]).
If Anne came into service at age fifteen—as “a bare‐foot child”, according to Georgiana Burne‐Jones (Memorials of Edward Burne‐Jones, 1:300)—then she would have begun work around 1814, and in a Ruskin household prior to that of John James and Margaret Ruskin, who were not married until 2 February 1818. W. G. Collingwood states that she “had come from the Edinburgh home” of John Thomas and Catherine Ruskin (Life of John Ruskin [1900], 26); however, Helen Viljoen realizes that in 1814 the elder Ruskins—who were John Jamesʼs parents and Margaretʼs aunt and uncle—were living in Perth, not Edinburgh, in the house known as Bowerswell. Viljoen connects these facts with Ruskinʼs implication in Praeterita that Anne was his fatherʼs nurse before she was his, and concludes that the girl must have helped with John Jamesʼs convalescence at Bowerswell from typhoid. He came down with a fever while on the road to Perth in August 1813, and the disease kept him confined at Bowerswell until July 1814 (Ruskinʼs Scottish Heritage, 157, 246 n. 23; and see Catherine to John James Ruskin, 14 August 1813, and Margaret Cock to John James Ruskin, in Burd, ed., Ruskin Family Letters, 63–64, 67–70).
It was Margaret who was sent to rescue John James when he fell ill on the way to Perth (Catherine to John James Ruskin, 14 August 1813 and 21 August 1813, in Burd, ed., Ruskin Family Letters , 64, 66–67). In the ensuing months, she would have been stretched between her regular housekeeping duties and nursing John James, so it makes sense that a girl would have been hired to help in the house. The fifteen‐year‐old Anne presumably was inexperienced, not yet the servant who, according to Ruskinʼs testimonial, “was never quite in her glory unless some of us were ill” (Ruskin, Works, 35:39). But a mere girlʼs service may have been as much as the Ruskins could afford in their straitened circumstances. To reduce expenses, Catherine had pressed her husband to move from Edinburgh to the country, where household management could be confined to “Meggy [i.e., Margaret] my self and one servant” (Catherine to John James Ruskin, 15 March 1808, in Burd, ed., Ruskin Family Letters, 23). They had already lived a year in the “retired” but “shabby” coastal town of Dysart before moving to Perth to be near the household of their daughter, John Jamesʼs sister, Janet (“Jessie”) Richardson (1783–1828) and her husband, Patrick Richardson (1774–1824).
Anne is not mentioned in surviving family correspondence, 1814–18; she first appears (assuming she is the “Anna” taking orders from Margaret) in the earliest surviving letter written by Margaret to John James following their marriage, when living at their Hunter Street house in London. John was at this time a newborn (26 March 1819, in Burd, ed., Ruskin Family Letters, 92, 94 n. 6). But if Anne had been present in the background over the past five years, she was to some extent privy to the most dramatic events of her employersʼ lives. John James and Margaret had been betrothed since 1809, and the crisis of John Jamesʼs near‐lethal illness appears to have deepened their commitment, but now their union faced opposition by John Thomas. John James was convinced that the tension would bring about Margaretʼs death (see Margaret Cock to John James Ruskin, 12 July 1814; John James Ruskin to Margaret Cock, 22 March 1815 and 13 April 1815; and John James to Catherine and John Thomas Ruskin, 13 April 1815, in Burd, ed., Ruskin Family Letters, 67–77). Unexpectedly, in June 1815, John Thomas descended into madness. His sonʼs emotions were divided between apprehension for his parents and relief for himself and Margaret. Writing to his mother, John James rejected recourse to a “public asylum” where his father would be subjected to “Surrounding Horrors”, while recognizing that even “the strictest confinement” at home risked the “safety” and “health of the rest of the family”. Writing to Margaret, he expressed compassion for his fatherʼs “frailties” but he could not resist interpreting his fatherʼs madness to their advantage as having rendered his father “in a manner dead to all of us”, exonerating the family from “a place in his affections”, and putting their “actions” beyond a hold even on John Thomasʼs “least interest” much less his control. John James also fretted over how public exposure “may injure me in business” (John James to Catherine Ruskin, 30 June 1815; and John James Ruskin to Margaret Cock, 3 July 1815, in Burd, ed., Ruskin Family Letters, 79, 80). As it turned out, release came by way of further calamity: in October 1817, Catherine Ruskin died suddenly, followed shortly by John Thomasʼs bloody suicide. At the time, Margaret was already in mourning for her own mother, Margaret Cock of Croydon. Throughout all this, John James was struggling to launch a new wine importing business in partnership with Pedro Domecq and Henry Telford, for his fateful journey north in 1813 had been prompted by his flight from the declining fortunes of his previous employer, Gordon, Murphy, & Company (see the correspondence, 1812–17, in Burd, ed., Ruskin Family Letters, 53–88; and Hilton, John Ruskin: The Early Years, 6–8).
As a young servant at Bowerswell, Anne shared the womenʼs vantage on these events, which helps to explain a degree of intimacy between her and Margaret. One can only speculate, however, about the causes that underlay a prickliness in their relationship, which is treated as comedy in reminiscences by Ruskin and by Georgiana Burne‐Jones, but with a strong suggestion that Anne was fiercely loyal to John James and John to the detriment of civility to Margaret and “a want of deference” toward her mistress that, as Burne‐Jones put it, “was certainly not the growth of the moment” (see Ruskin, Works, 35:31; G. Burne‐Jones, Memorials of Edward Burne‐Jones, 300–301). One can only speculate, too, about how Anne chose to manage her power by virtue of her presence at events that John James and Margaret presumably did not want divulged to John—at least in his youth.
Glimpses of Anneʼs supervision of John appear frequently in the family letters: sitting with him in church, a few rows behind Margaret (Margaret to John James Ruskin, 2 April 1821); looking after him apart from Margaretʼs sisterʼs family, while Margaret visited the house of her sister Bridget Richardson in Croydon (Margaret to John James Ruskin, 30 January 1822). Margaret records an episode of John tearfully assuming he must be “bad” since neither Anne nor his papa were available to “take care of me” (Margaret to John James Ruskin, 30 January 1822) (Burd, ed., Ruskin Family Letters, 100, 108, 108–9)
At any rate, the somewhat caricatured “white‐haired, light‐eyed, spare little figure, harsh and unattractive to our southern feeling” as perceived by Burne‐Jones (Memorials of Burne‐Jones, 300) was only in her twenties and early thirties when she accompanied John and his cousin Mary Richardson on many of their formative encounters at home and during travels in Britain and abroad.