The Buyers
While the
Greenaway collection and some of the rarer library items caught buyersʼ interest,
it was the
Ruskin manuscripts reserved for the second half of the sale that commanded the highest prices,
according to the notations in the Beinecke copy of the catalogue.
Prices ranged from £440 for the manuscript of
The Stones of Venice,
to £520 for the collection of
Ruskinʼs letters to his father,
to £1,600 for
Ruskinʼs diaries.
The
Stones manuscript and the diaries were acquired by
Whitehouse, who spent a total of £2,089 at the sale,
thus assuring that his collection,
Dearden writes, held “its position at the head of
Ruskin collections”
(
Dearden, Ruskin, Bembridge, and Brantwood, 55).
Whitehouse had a competitor, however—
Charles Eliot Goodspeed—who bypassed the high‐profile items such as the diaries and manuscripts
of the better‐known
Ruskin works, and adopted an alternative strategy.
The most prominent buyers at the
1930 sale seem to have shared a perception of themselves as watchful to uphold a proper custodianship
of the
Ruskin archive. In his autobiography,
Goodspeed quoted
Ruskinʼs intentions for his estate as laid out in his will, and implied that the Severn family acted in bad faith
by authorizing the Sothebyʼs auctions. Serving as an agent at the sale was
Hugh Allen,
a son of
George Allen (1849–1907).
When
Hugh Allen died soon after the Sothebyʼs sales,
in
August 1931, Ralph Brown of B. F. Stevens & Brown
wrote to
Goodspeed to eulogize “our friend” as
“a sad loss to
Ruskin lovers as his knowledge and kindly interest
was always at the disposal of those, who like himself, admired the great Victorian”
(
Brown to Goodspeed, 29 August 1931, ).
Charles Eliot Goodspeed
The
Boston bookseller and collector,
Charles E. Goodspeed,
had long been supplying American collectors with
Ruskin first editions. For customers aspiring to compile comprehensive collections,
Goodspeed said he “found no competition” in
London
for the hundreds of
Ruskin items beyond the typical antiquarian dealerʼs core of first‐edition (or earlier edition) volumes of
Modern Painters,
Seven Lamps of Architecture, and
Stones of Venice
(
Goodspeed, Yankee Bookseller, 263;
and see
Charles E. Goodspeed [1867–1950]).
Goodspeed took the same approach to the
1930 Sothebyʼs sale, assisted by B. F. Stevens & Brown as his agent.
Whereas
Whitehouseʼs manuscript acquisitions were canonical by the standards of the time—the diaries,
the
Stones of Venice manuscript, and lot 119, which was headed by manuscript for the
Catalogue of Sketches by Turner (1878)—
Goodspeed
targeted very early and very late works: for example, manuscripts of
King of the Golden River (lot 114, £155),
a portion of
Fors Clavigera (lot 118, £50), and
Praeterita (£155). His strategy is consistent with the biographical bias
animating collectors of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, who aspired to comprehensive ownership
of every published item by their modern authors of choice, from juvenilia to last works (see
The Collecting of Modern Authors in the Late Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Centuries; and see
Catalogue of the Manuscripts and Remaining Library of John Ruskin,
21, 24–25).
Goodspeed, the 1930 Acquisitions, and Yale University Library
In his
1937 autobiography,
Goodspeed mentions that he acquired the
King,
Fors, and
Praeterita manuscripts,
and that he kept the
Praeterita manuscript for himself, selling the other two
(
Yankee Bookseller, 267).
Evidence at the
Beinecke Library shows that his buyer for the
King and
Fors manuscripts was Yale University Library,
and that the sale included additional manuscripts acquired at the
1930 sale, which
Goodspeed does not mention in his memoir:
Proserpina (lot 117, £30);
miscellaneous notebooks, mostly on literary, historical, and geological topics (lot 122, £38);
an assortment of Oxford lectures,
lectures on the Val dʼArno, and a stray Architectural Note Book belonging to the 1850–51
Venice labors
(lot 116, £70); and from the books portion of the sale,
Ruskinʼs
set of the
Botanical Magazine, with his marginalia (lot 16).
The transfer of these items to Yale University Library was made quickly, sold in early
November 1930 for a total price of $3,000.
(Except for lot 16, all of these additional items are notated in the Beinecke copy of the
Sothebyʼs catalogue as sold to B. F. Stevens & Brown,
Goodspeedʼs agent; and the purchase of the
Botanical Magazine
is credited to Stevens & Brown by
James Dearden in
Ruskin, Bembridge, and Brantwood, 48.)
Curiously, in what appears to be the earliest published report describing acquisitions by Yale
from the
July 1930 Sothebyʼs sale, none of these items is mentioned.
Instead, a
January 1931 report in the
Yale University Library Gazette
lengthily describes manuscripts that were not listed in
Goodspeedʼs
November 1930 sale—namely,
lots 110 and 112, consisting of the six bound volumes of Ruskin family letters and the six slipcases containing juvenilia.
In the
Gazette, these items are celebrated as forming
“a considerable portion of the
Brantwood collection of
Ruskin manuscripts”
which is “now preserved for all time against sale and spoliation” at Yale
(
Weihe, “A Collection of Ruskin Manuscripts”, 47).
It is possible that the phrase “considerable portion of the
Brantwood collection” is meant also to comprise
the items acquired from
Goodspeed, and that the writer chose to focus on lots 110 and 112.
Not only would these acquisitions have stood out from the rest by virtue of their striking blue‐morocco casings;
their contents were also notable for their biographical interest, particularly pertaining to
Ruskinʼs youth—and in that respect, the writer goes on, “this noteworthy group” of juvenilia and letters
represented “an impressive addition to the Libraryʼs collection of Ruskiniana”, which had been recently augmented
by “the completeness of its first editions and rarity of its items” donated in
1929 as the
R. B. Adam Collection
(
Weihe, “A Collection of Ruskin Manuscripts”, 47;
and see
French, “The R. B. Adam Collection of Ruskin” and
R. B. Adam II [1863–1940]). Still, the
Adam Collection
would have seemed complemented not only by the juvenilia but also by the manuscripts of late works acquired from
Goodspeed.
The report seems to testify to a special interest in the early manuscripts, at least among American collectors. It also begs the question of just how these manuscripts
made their way to Yale from the
1930 Sothebyʼs auction.
According to the annotated
Sothebyʼs catalogue at the Beinecke,
the successful bids for lots 110 and 112 were placed by
“Allen” (lot 110, £520; lot 112, £260).
That this was a member of the
George Allen family, probably
Hugh Allen,
can be gathered from a letter by
Ralph Brown of B. F. Stevens & Brown
to
J. H. Whitehouse on the occasion of the
Severn Sale of Ruskin Effects, 1931:
“we are having the benefit of the assistance of our friend Mr.
Hugh Allen,
and his help has been invaluable”, as compared with “the lack of interest shown by the Severn family in all matters pertaining to
Ruskin”
(quoted in
Dearden, Ruskin, Bembridge, and Brantwood, 87).
Beyond the initial purchase of lots 110 and 112 by
Allen, however, the details of the manuscriptsʼ journey
from
London to
New Haven are obscured by conflicting evidence.
According to a
1942 article,
“Yale Collection of the Manuscripts of John Ruskin”,
by
Charles Beecher Hogan, lot 112 containing the twelve “little notebooks” of juvenilia were
“purchased by Mr.
Charles Goodspeed” when they were auctioned “en bloc at Sothebyʼs”,
and “in turn” these items were “purchased by Yale”. If true, it seems odd that
Goodspeed
would have commissioned two agents at the sale—
Allen, as well as B. F. Stevens & Brown—unless, for some reason,
Allen acted in concert
with B. F. Stevens & Brown to obtain these two particular lots. Adding to the confusion,
Hogan says that the volumes of letters (lot 110) “were purchased by
Yale at the Sotheby auction of
July 24, 1930”—a
vague statement, suggesting either that Yale did not transact through
Goodspeed for lot 110,
or that
Goodspeedʼs mediation is to be taken for granted by the reader. The latter assumption should have been clarified
by a footnote specifying that “other items that came from
Brantwood, through Sotheby and
Goodspeed” have been “marked
with an asterisk”.
Hogan does not attach an asterisk to “the magnificent assemblage of
Ruskinʼs letters” at Yale,
leading one to the conclusion that Yale acquired the letters, lot 110, directly through the agency of
Hugh Allen,
while lot 112 came roundabout to Yale, from
Allen to
Goodspeed to the university library
(
Hogan, “Yale Collection of the Manuscripts of John Ruskin”, 62, 63).
This conclusion seems confirmed by the current (
June 2014) Beinecke Library
“Guide to the John Ruskin Collection”,
which describes the provenance of the letters laconically as “Bought at Sothebyʼs,
1930”,
and the provenance of the juvenilia more specifically as “Bought from Goodspeedʼs Book Shop, Inc.,
1930”—but
these annotations may have been based
Hoganʼs article, thus representing no additional information.
Nor is further illumination provided by Yaleʼs
“Report of the Librarian, July 1, 1930–June 30, 1931”,
which was published on
1 April 1932. The annual report summarizes the purchase of “a large mass of
Ruskin material”,
listing “letters written by him to his father” (but not the juvenilia, lot 112) along with the items that formed the documented
Goodspeed purchase.
Perhaps the obscurity surrounding these purchases must simply be put down their having been overshadowed by what this same issue of the
“Report of the Librarian” heralds as
“the great event of the year—the greatest since the founding of the Library”—namely,
“the transfer of the books and of the functions of the Library to the
Sterling Memorial building” (pp. 8, 3).
Chauncey Brewster Tinker and Yale University Library in 1930–31
At about the same time that Yaleʼs new
Sterling Library building was completed and opened in
1930–31,
Chauncey Brewster Tinker (1876–1963)
took up his post as keeper of rare books for the Library, which was added to his professorial appointment in the English Department.
While
Tinkerʼs name does not appear in connection with acquisition of lots 110 and 112
from the
1930 Sothebyʼs sale—the letters and juvenilia—he is likely to have taken a keen interest
in these
Ruskin materials, and advised about their acquisition. Sources differ whether
Tinker
was appointed keeper of rare books in
1930 or
1931,
but the Beineckeʼs
“Guide to the John Ruskin Collection”
credits all the lots from the
1930 sale, apart from lots 110 and 112, as having been
“bought by
Chauncey B. Tinker,
1930” or
“bought from Goodspeedʼs Book Shop by
Chauncey B. Tinker,
1930”.
An exception is lot 117, four notebooks containing manuscript of
Proserpina,
which is listed as “gift of
Chauncey Brewster Tinker,
1930”,
although this lot is otherwise documented as packaged with the $3,000 purchase from
Goodspeed.
Unsurprisingly, then,
Tinker was intimately involved in the
Goodspeed transaction,
although details of the arrangement remain to be investigated—for example, whether he held the
Proserpina manuscript
for himself for a time, or simply donated funds for that portion of the purchase—and the separate provenance of lots 110 and 112 remains a mystery.
Tinker had long been an advocate for building up the Libraryʼs collection, especially its rare book collection,
and he was a legendary teacher of eighteenth‐ and nineteenth‐century literature—including
Ruskin,
whom he treated seriously as a thinker, and not just as a prose stylist.
Tinker was also known for giving students access to manuscripts and rare books from his extensive personal collection,
which included
Ruskin; and he was aware of the extent and interest of
Ruskinʼs bibliographical history.
In
1929, the year prior to the Sothebyʼs sale,
Tinkerʼs close friend and fellow collector,
R. B. Adam II (1863–1940),
donated his meticulously curated
Ruskin collection to Yale; and it is notable how felicitously lots 110 and 112,
the letters and juvenilia, complement
Adamʼs bequest, which includes the run of early poems published in annuals
(
Pathak, “Chauncey Brewster Tinker”, 278–80;
Metzdorf, The Tinker Library, viii;
French, “The R. D. Adam Collection of Ruskin”, 3–4; and see further,
Chauncey Brewster Tinker [1876–1963]).
It would not have been lost on
Tinker that
Ruskin materials formed an appropriate acquisition at the time when the Yale Library
was moving to the newly completed
Sterling Memorial Building, an imposing Gothic Revival structure.
For the architectural context of Yale Libraryʼs
Ruskin collecting, see
Early Ruskin Manuscript Collecting by American Research Libraries.