Margaret Ruskinʼs Gloss on the Dating of MS I
Date
January 1826–January 1827.
At the end of “The Needless Alarm,”
Margaret Ruskin
wrote “
Jany 1826.” Immediately below this, she drew a horizontal
rule, followed by “this book begun about
Sept
or Oct 1826 / finished about
Jany 1827.”
Clearly, “this book” refers to the whole of
MS I; and, therefore,
W. G. Collingwood took the preceding date,
“
Jany 1826,” as applying to “The Needless Alarm” in
particular and thus as identifying
Ruskinʼs earliest dated verse known to
that editor (
Poems [4o, 1891],
1:xxii;
Poems [8o, 1891], 1:viii).
In the
Library Edition,
E. T. Cook and
Alexander Wedderburn
disagreed with
Collingwoodʼs interpretation, ascribing the status of the earliest dated verse possibly to
“When furious up from mines the water pours” [“The Steam Engine”],
which is “poem I” in the
MS I Poetry Anthology:
“there is nothing to show,” they wrote, “that [
Margaretʼs date] does not apply equally to all four pieces, composed
presumably in the order in which they are placed in the book.” (They also pointed to another possible contendor,
besides
“When furious up from mines the water pours” [“The Steam Engine”],
for the distinction of earliest poem—
“Ragland Castle,” which is the first poem in another
anthology,
Poetry Descriptive, in
MS III,
and which they date “as early as these” poems in
MS I
[
Ruskin, Works, 2:255 n. 1;
see
“Wales”: Date].)
Putting aside
Cook and
Wedderburnʼs faulty assumptions about the composition of the poems in the anthology
(i.e., that
Margaretʼs note necessarily refers to all
four poems preceding the note, not just to “The Needless Alarm”; and that the first poem of this group
to be fair‐copied,
“When furious up from mines the water pours” [“The Steam Engine”]
or “poem I,” must necessarily have been the first composed), their interpretation of what
Margaretʼs date,
“
Jany 1826,” does signify seems hardly credible: the date, according to the editors, “seems to be the date of the note, and not of any one of the verses in
particular.” That is, in their view, “
Jany 1826” applies to
the note that follows, “this book begun about
Sept or Oct 1826 / finished about
Jany 1827.”
The obvious discrepancy between the alleged date
of the note and the date
in the note is explained, further,
as the writerʼs mistake: “perhaps, writing at the beginning of a new year,
Mrs. Ruskin made the common error of not altering the
old yearʼs date”—writing, that is, “
Jany 1826,” but intending
“
Jany 1827” (
Ruskin, Works, 2:255 n. 1).
Since Cook and Wedderburnʼs reasoning depends on overruling what
Margaret actually wrote,
Collingwoodʼs interpretation seems certainly more
straightforward and surely at least as convincing—namely, that her first date applies to “The Needless Alarm,” but not necessarily to all four
of the poems preceding the note. While “The Needless Alarm” must have been fair‐copied “about
Jany
1827” along with the other verse at the end of
MS I,
Margaret would have known if
Ruskin had composed
the poem a year earlier than the others. There is, moreover, another instance of
Margaretʼs glossing a poem with a date earlier than surrounding
poems—
“Glen of Glenfarg” (“Glen of Glenfarg thy beauteous rill”),
in
MS III—and, in that case,
Cook and
Wedderburn do accept
Margaretʼs authority at face value. Finally, it seems
implausible that
Margaret would have written
1826 for
1827 without noticing the error, since her note about the date of
the whole of
MS I (which is unquestioned) is placed immediately below.
Without following
Cook and
Wedderburn in their argument for dating “The Needless Alarm” some time after
“When furious up from mines the water pours” [“The Steam Engine”],
one might, however, accept their suggestion that
Margaret intends “
Jany 1826” to refer to all four poems
preceding her note. This possibility is entertained in dating these poems.