Date
January 1826–January 1827.
Evidence for dating this poem turns on
Margaret Ruskinʼs Gloss on the Dating of MS I. In
“Poetry” [MS I Poetry Anthology]—at the
end of
“The Needless Alarm”, the fourth poem in the anthology, and before
“On Papaʼs Leaving Home”,
the fifth poem—
Margaret Ruskin
wrote “Jan
y 1826”. Immediately below this, she drew a horizontal rule, followed by “this book begun about
Sept
or Oct 1826 / finished about
Jany 1827.” Since the latter comment clearly refers to the whole of
MS I,
W. G. Collingwood took the preceding date,
January 1826, as applying to
“The Needless Alarm” in particular and thus as identifying
Ruskinʼs earliest dated verse
(
Poems [4o, 1891],
1:xxii;
Poems [8o, 1891], 1:viii).
If
Margaretʼs intention was to apply the date to
“The Needless Alarm”, the date may point to a more elementary
stage of
Ruskinʼs reading, one year earlier than the scientific readings reflected elsewhere in the contents of
MS I—evidence of a graduated program of reading recommended by
educationalists such as the Edgeworths (see
Discussion).
In the
Library Edition,
E. T. Cook and
Alexander Wedderburn
disagreed with
Collingwoodʼs interpretation, ascribing the status of earliest dated verse possibly to
“When furious up from mines the water pours” [“The Steam Engine”],
which is “poem I” in
“Poetry” [MS I Poetry Anthology]: “there is nothing to show”, they write, “that
[
Margaretʼs date] does not apply equally to all four pieces, composed presumably in the order in which they are placed in the book”. Moreover,
along with
“When furious up from mines the water pours” [“The Steam Engine”], they point
to another contender for earliest poem—
“Ragland Castle”, which is the first poem in another
anthology,
“Poetry Discriptive”, in
MS III,
and which they date “as early as these” poems in
MS I
(
Ruskin, Works, 2:255 n. 1; see
“Wales”: Date).
“Ragland Castle”, however, more likely belongs to the
second half of 1827, when the family visited
Raglan
and other sites in
Wales. The earlier date ascribed by
Cook and
Wedderburn to
“When furious up from mines the water pours” [“The Steam Engine”] turns,
moreover, on reasoning that elaborately interprets and even changes what
Margaret wrote. That argument assumes, first, that
Margaretʼs note
“
Jany 1826” refers to all four poems preceding the note, not just to
“The Needless Alarm”; second, that the first poem of this group
to be fair‐copied—
“When furious up from mines the water pours” [“The Steam Engine”],
or “poem I”—must necessarily have been the first composed; and, third, that
Margaretʼs date,
“
Jany 1826”, “seems to be the date of the note”, according to the editors, “and not of any one of the verses in
particular”. That is, in this view, “
Jany 1826” applies to the note that follows, “this book begun about
Sept or Oct 1826 / finished about
Jany 1827”.
The obvious discrepancy in this argument is explained by the editors as the writerʼs mistake: “perhaps, writing at the
beginning of a new year,
Mrs. Ruskin made the common error of not altering the old yearʼs date”—writing, that is, “
Jany
1826”, but intending “
Jany 1827” (
Ruskin, Works, 2:255 n. 1).
Since
Cook and
Wedderburnʼs reasoning depends on overruling what
Margaret actually wrote,
Collingwoodʼs interpretation seems certainly more
straightforward and surely at least as convincing—namely, that the date applies to
“The Needless Alarm” but not necessarily to all four
of the poems preceding the note. While
“The Needless Alarm” must have been fair‐copied “about
Jany 1827”
along with the other verse at the end of
MS I,
Margaret would have known if
Ruskin had composed
the poem a year earlier than the others (and if that was the case, she may have remembered the date because
“The Needless Alarm” was possibly the
first—or first surviving—of
Ruskinʼs
New Yearʼs Poems;
see
Discussion). Moreover, there is another instance of
Margaretʼs
glossing a poem with a date earlier than surrounding poems—
“Glen of Glenfarg” (“Glen of Glenfarg thy beauteous rill”),
in
MS III—and, in that case,
Cook and
Wedderburn accept
Margaretʼs authority at face value. Finally, it seems
implausible that
Margaret would have written
1826 for
1827 without noticing the error, since her note about the date of the whole of
MS I (which is unquestioned) is placed immediately below.
Without following
Cook and
Wedderburn in their argument for dating
“The Needless Alarm” some time after
“When furious up from mines the water pours” [“The Steam Engine”], one might, however, accept their suggestion
that
Margaret intends “
Jany 1826” to refer to all four poems preceding her note. This possibility is admitted in dating the other three poems—
“When furious up from mines the water pours” [“The Steam Engine”],
“On Scotland”, and
“The Defiance of War”—but, again, the interpretation supplants a more obvious
and convincing explanation.
Collingwood associated one poem in the
“Poetry” [MS I Poetry Anthology],
“On Scotland”, along with another,
“Glen of Glenfarg” (“Glen of Glenfarg thy beauteous rill”),
with the familyʼs visit to
Scotland in
1826, which he assumed to have started “about the
middle of May”
(
Poems [4o, 1891],
1:xxiii;
Poems [8o, 1891], 1:ix). We now
know that this journey was taken, if at all, later in that year—a fact consistent with the placement of
“On Scotland” toward the end of
MS I, which was “finished about
Jany 1827”
(see also
Tours of 1826–27). All the evidence,
even the evidence of which
Collingwood was unaware, falls into place if
Collingwoodʼs original interpretation is accepted—namely, that
“The Needless Alarm” existed (in some form, now lost) a year earlier than the surrounding poems. This conclusion also seems corroborated by internal
evidence of the poemʼs sources (see
Discussion).